<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Internet Law - Rivera Law Group &#187; Criminal defense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cyberinternetlawyer.com/tag/criminal-defense/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cyberinternetlawyer.com</link>
	<description>Internet Lawyers, Technical Expert, Computer Engineer, MBA, and Business / E-Commerce Law Specialist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 17:13:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Commercial Email SPAM</title>
		<link>http://cyberinternetlawyer.com/commercial_email_spam.html</link>
		<comments>http://cyberinternetlawyer.com/commercial_email_spam.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 20:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commercial E-mail / SPAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer Crime Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber Attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Copyright Infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark Infringement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberinternetlawyer.com/?p=24</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Commercial Email, SPAM, and the CAN-SPAM Act
Our Internet Lawyers frequently handle matters related to Internet Spam Laws and the CAN-SPAM Act. We frequently encounter this scenario: A business is interested in sending legally compliant commercial email. Or perhaps, a business' servers are working at a snail's pace and your IT staff is working overtime to control the bombardment of unsolicited bulk emails.

It is very important to seek the assistance of an attorney who understands the legal implications and ramifications of spam laws, the most important of which is that CAN-SPAM Act.

The CAN-SPAM Act is codified under 15 U.S.C. § 7701-7713. Contrary to the belief of many, the CAN-SPAM Act does not prohibit sending spam emails. Instead, it imposes certain requirements. These mandatory requirements include the use of accurate email subject lines and transmission information, opt-out procedures where recipients can elect not to receive additional emails from the sender, mandatory time frames for the removal of users who elect to opt-out, and a prohibition of improper email harvesting.

But, what happens when a sender complies with all the requirements of CAN-SPAM? Can an ISP still refuse to deliver compliant email messages to the intended recipients?

Non-compliance with CAN-SPAM will probably result in criminal prosecution under SPAM laws and other cyber crime laws, but compliance does not guarantee that an overzealous ISP will deliver the legally compliant emails to its intended recipients.

Our attorneys understand Spam Laws and the CAN-SPAM Act. If you or your business needs the advice of a spam attorney, we are ready to assist you.  We frequently advise businesses to structure their commercial email campaign in a manner that adequately manages business risk and limits business liability.  We frequently deal with all civil and criminal aspects of commercial bulk email, for example:

    * A business requests the services of an Internet lawyer with CAN-SPAM compliance understanding to make sure that its commercial email campaign is properly implemented.
    * An individual receives a cease and desist letter from an attorney accusing him of sending illegal spam emails and demanding a large amount of monetary damages.  The cease and desist letter also threatens civil and criminal prosecution.  A commercial email spam defense lawyer evaluates the situation and responds to the baseless allegations of sending illegal commercial email.
    * An individual faces criminal charges alleging that he sent thousands of spam email in violation of state and federal law.  A spam email defense attorney analyzes the electronic evidence and forensic records to build an effective defense.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Commercial  Email, SPAM, and the CAN-SPAM Act</h3>
<div id="container2">
<div id="content1">Our Internet Lawyers frequently handle matters  		related to Internet Spam Laws and the CAN-SPAM Act. We frequently encounter this scenario: A  		business is interested in sending legally compliant commercial email. Or  		perhaps, a business&#8217; servers are working at a snail&#8217;s pace and your IT  		staff is working overtime to control the bombardment of unsolicited bulk  		emails.</p>
<p>It is very important to seek the  		assistance of an attorney who understands the legal implications and  		ramifications of spam laws, the most important of which is that CAN-SPAM  		Act.</p>
<p>The CAN-SPAM Act is codified under 15  		U.S.C. § 7701-7713. Contrary to the belief of many, the CAN-SPAM Act  		does not prohibit sending spam emails. Instead, it imposes certain  		requirements. These mandatory requirements include the use of accurate  		email subject lines and transmission information, opt-out procedures  		where recipients can elect not to receive additional emails from the  		sender, mandatory time frames for the removal of users who elect to  		opt-out, and a prohibition of improper email harvesting.</p>
<p>But, what happens when a sender complies  		with all the requirements of CAN-SPAM? Can an ISP still refuse to  		deliver compliant email messages to the intended recipients?</p>
<p>Non-compliance with CAN-SPAM will  		probably result in          <a href="http://www.cyber-crime-defense.com/Bulk_Email_SPAM.html" target="_blank"> criminal prosecution under SPAM laws</a> and other cyber  		crime laws, but compliance does not guarantee that an overzealous ISP  		will deliver the legally compliant emails to its intended recipients.</p>
<p>Our attorneys understand Spam Laws  		and the CAN-SPAM Act. If you or your business needs the advice of a  		spam attorney, we are ready to assist you.  We frequently advise          businesses to structure their commercial email campaign in a manner that          adequately manages business risk and limits business liability.  We          frequently deal with all civil and criminal aspects of commercial bulk          email, for example:</p>
<ul>
<li>A business requests the services of            an Internet lawyer with CAN-SPAM compliance understanding to make sure            that its commercial email campaign is properly implemented.</li>
<li>An individual receives a cease and            desist letter from an attorney accusing him of sending illegal spam            emails and demanding a large amount of monetary damages.  The            cease and desist letter also threatens civil and criminal prosecution.             A commercial email spam defense lawyer evaluates the situation and            responds to the baseless allegations of sending illegal commercial            email.</li>
<li>An individual faces criminal charges            alleging that he sent thousands of spam email in violation of state            and federal law.  A spam email defense attorney analyzes the            electronic evidence and forensic records to build an effective            defense.</li>
</ul>
<p><a title="Internet Lawyer" href="http://cyberinternetlawyer.com/contact-us" target="_self"> Contact Us For a Free  		Internet Law Consultation</a></p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cyberinternetlawyer.com/commercial_email_spam.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Domingo Rivera</title>
		<link>http://cyberinternetlawyer.com/domingorivera.html</link>
		<comments>http://cyberinternetlawyer.com/domingorivera.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 02:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Lawyer Domingo Rivera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber Attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domingo Rivera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Copyright Infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark Infringement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberinternetlawyer.com/?p=77</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Domingo J. Rivera, Internet Lawyer

An Internet Law pioneer with a proven record, Domingo J. Rivera was the first attorney in the United States to win a complex jury trial involving Federal Copyright Infringement, music piracy criminal allegations.

Domingo J. Rivera earned a BS in Computer Engineering, an MBA with a specialty in Information Technology Management, and a Doctorate of Jurisprudence.  Domingo J. Rivera is also a registered Electrical Engineering E.I.T. in the State of Florida.

Prior to attending law school, he was a US Navy Engineering Officer, and was lead engineer for the Homeland Security Headquarters located in Norfolk, Virginia. In that capacity, Mr. Rivera held a Department of Defense Top Secret Clearance with NATO access.

Domingo J. Rivera has over ten years of software programming and development.  His technical abilities are exceptional, with advanced knowledge of most popular computer programming languages including C++, PHP, CGI, Pascal, Java, Visual Basic, HTML,  XML, and several other programming languages.

Domingo J. Rivera, Internet Lawyer, is a member of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, the American Intellectual Property Law Association, the Virginia State Bar, the American Bar Association, and the Virginia Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.  He is also fluent in the Spanish language.

When the Department of Defense needed a technical and management person to lead one its most important projects during a critical time in the history of the United States, Domingo J. Rivera received the call.  As your Internet Lawyer, Domingo J. Rivera will apply the same high standards to assist you with your Internet Law case.  You should expect no less from your Internet Lawyer.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Domingo J. Rivera, Internet   Lawyer</h3>
<p>An Internet Law pioneer with a proven record, Domingo J. Rivera was the first attorney in the United States to win a complex jury trial involving Federal Copyright Infringement, music piracy criminal allegations.</p>
<div id="container2">
<div id="content1">
<p>Domingo J.  		Rivera earned a BS in Computer Engineering, an MBA  		with a specialty in Information Technology Management, and a Doctorate   		of Jurisprudence.  Domingo J. Rivera is also a registered Electrical  		Engineering E.I.T. in the State of Florida.</p>
<p>Prior to attending law school, he was a US  		Navy Engineering Officer, and was lead engineer for the Homeland  		Security Headquarters located in Norfolk, Virginia. In that capacity,  		Mr. Rivera held a Department of Defense Top Secret Clearance with NATO   		access.</p>
<p>Domingo J. Rivera has over ten years of software  		programming and development.  His technical abilities are exceptional,   		with advanced knowledge of most popular computer programming languages   		including C++, PHP, CGI, Pascal, Java, Visual Basic, HTML,  XML, and several other programming languages.</p>
<p>Domingo J. Rivera, Internet Lawyer, is a member of  the  		Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, the American  		Intellectual Property Law Association, the Virginia State Bar, the  		American Bar Association, and the Virginia Association of Criminal  		Defense Lawyers.  He is also fluent in the Spanish language.</p>
<p>When the Department of Defense needed a   		<a href="http://www.cyberinternetlawyer.com/Internet_Trial_Attorney.html" target="_blank"> technical and management person</a> to lead one  its most important projects  		during a critical time in the history of the United States, Domingo J.   		Rivera received the call.  As your Internet Lawyer, Domingo J. Rivera  		will apply the same high standards to assist you with your Internet  Law  		case.  You should expect no less from your Internet Lawyer.</p>
<p><a title="Internet Lawyer" href="http://cyberinternetlawyer.com/contact-us" target="_self"> Contact Us For a Free   		Internet Law Consultation</a></p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cyberinternetlawyer.com/domingorivera.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cease and Desist Letter</title>
		<link>http://cyberinternetlawyer.com/cease_and_desist_letter.html</link>
		<comments>http://cyberinternetlawyer.com/cease_and_desist_letter.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 02:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc. Internet Law Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cease and Desist Notice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber Attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defamation Attorney. Internet Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Copyright Infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark Infringement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberinternetlawyer.com/?p=89</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Cease and Desist Notice

You may need an Internet lawyer to assist you with the preparation of a cease and desist letter when your business is the victim of Internet copyright infringement, Internet trademark infringement, Internet defamation, domain name legal issues, or other Internet law issues.

Your Internet business may need an effective cease and desist letter to prevent your competitors from copying the contents of your website in order to take advantage of the success of your online business.... or you may have received an Internet copyright infringement cease and desist notice from an Internet copyright infringement lawyer or Internet trademark infringement lawyer asking you for a significant amount of monetary damages. In addition the copyright infringement cease and desist notice written may contain threats indicating that your company will be the target of a copyright infringement lawsuit, and an injunction against Internet copyright infringement.  Our Internet lawyers can provide assistance in drafting an effective cease and desist notice or responding to a cease and desist notice.

Effective handling of the cease and desist letter may determine whether or not expensive court litigation will be necessary to resolve the legal dispute.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Cease and Desist Notice</h3>
<p>You may need an Internet lawyer to assist you with the   preparation of a cease and desist letter when your business is the  victim of <a href="http://www.cyberinternetlawyer.com/Copyright_Infringement.html">Internet   copyright infringement</a>, <a href="http://www.cyberinternetlawyer.com/Trademark_Infringement.html">Internet   trademark infringement</a>, <a href="http://www.cyberinternetlawyer.com/Online_Defamation.html">Internet   defamation</a>, <a href="http://www.cyberinternetlawyer.com/Domain_Name_Disputes.html">domain  name  legal issues</a>, or other Internet law issues.</p>
<p>Your Internet business may need an effective cease and  desist  letter to prevent your competitors from copying the contents of your  website in  order to take advantage of the success of your online business&#8230;. or  you may  have received an Internet copyright infringement cease and desist notice  from an  Internet copyright infringement lawyer or Internet trademark  infringement lawyer  asking you for a significant amount of monetary damages. In addition the   copyright infringement cease and desist notice written may contain  threats  indicating that your company will be the target of a copyright  infringement  lawsuit, and an injunction against Internet copyright infringement.  Our   Internet lawyers can provide assistance in drafting an effective  cease  and desist notice or responding to a cease and desist notice.</p>
<p>Effective handling of the cease and desist letter may  determine whether or not expensive court litigation will be necessary to  resolve  the legal dispute.</p>
<p><a title="Internet Lawyer" href="http://cyberinternetlawyer.com/contact-us" target="_self">Contact an Internet Lawyer</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cyberinternetlawyer.com/cease_and_desist_letter.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet Trial Attorney</title>
		<link>http://cyberinternetlawyer.com/internet_trial_attorney.html</link>
		<comments>http://cyberinternetlawyer.com/internet_trial_attorney.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 02:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Lawyer Domingo Rivera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misc. Internet Law Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber Attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Copyright Infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark Infringement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberinternetlawyer.com/?p=93</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An Internet Law pioneer with a proven record, Domingo J. Rivera was the first attorney in the United States to win a complex jury trial involving Federal Copyright Infringement, music piracy criminal allegations.
The importance of having a computer expert as your Internet trial attorney

During a cyber trial, whether related to copyright infringement, trademark infringement, domain name dispute, Internet defamation, or a computer crime trial, it is extremely important to have an attorney who has not only legal subject matter knowledge, but is also experienced in computer technology and the technical concepts related to the Internet.  We recently completed a long and complex cyber crime trial. We were fully equipped to expertly handle the criminal defense aspects of the case, we knew the law, how to cross-examine witnesses, and how to establish reasonable doubt. However, during the trial, it was our technical knowledge that allowed us to provide a unique perspective to the evidence presented.

The evidence presented at trial contained technical details that only an attorney with Internet technology knowledge would have recognized.  Your Internet lawyer must not only be effective in arguing Internet law, but must have superior technical knowledge to recognize complex technical issues "on the spot."

It takes a lot of finesse, patience, and competence to explain to effectively explain technical issues to the court. The typical non-technical attorney attempting to venture into Internet law may not understanding these technical concepts.  Our expertise includes technical degrees in Computer Engineering and years of Internet technology experience.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><strong>An Internet Law pioneer with a proven record, Domingo J.  Rivera was the  first attorney in the United States to win a complex  jury trial  involving Federal Copyright Infringement, music piracy  criminal  allegations.</strong></em></p>
<h3>The importance of having a  computer  expert as your Internet trial attorney</h3>
<p>During a cyber trial, whether related to copyright  infringement, trademark infringement, domain name dispute, Internet  defamation,  or a computer crime trial, it is extremely important to have an attorney  who has not only legal subject matter knowledge, but is also experienced in computer  technology and the technical concepts related to the Internet.  We  recently  completed a long and complex cyber crime trial. We were fully equipped  to  expertly handle the criminal defense aspects of the case, we knew the  law, how  to cross-examine witnesses, and how to establish reasonable doubt.  However,  during the trial, it was our technical knowledge that allowed us to  provide a  unique perspective to the evidence presented.</p>
<p>The evidence presented at trial contained technical  details  that only an attorney with Internet technology knowledge would  have  recognized.  Your Internet lawyer must not only be effective in arguing  Internet law, but must have superior technical knowledge to recognize  complex  technical issues &#8220;on the spot.&#8221;</p>
<p>It takes a lot of finesse, patience, and competence to  explain  to effectively explain technical issues to the court. The typical  non-technical  attorney attempting to venture into Internet law may not understanding  these  technical concepts.  Our expertise includes technical degrees in  Computer  Engineering and years of Internet technology experience.</p>
<p><a title="Internet Lawyer" href="http://cyberinternetlawyer.com/contact-us" target="_self"> Contact an Internet lawyer</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cyberinternetlawyer.com/internet_trial_attorney.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Texas Computer Crimes</title>
		<link>http://cyberinternetlawyer.com/texas-computer-crimes.html</link>
		<comments>http://cyberinternetlawyer.com/texas-computer-crimes.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 22:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Internet Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc. Internet Law Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer Hacking Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber Attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber Crime Defense Attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Computer Crimes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberinternetlawyer.com/?p=206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Texas Computer Crime Laws TITLE 7. OFFENSES AGAINST PROPERTY CHAPTER 33. COMPUTER CRIMES Sec. 33.01.  DEFINITIONS.  In this chapter: (1)  &#8221;Access&#8221; means to approach, instruct, communicate with, store data in, retrieve or intercept data from, alter data or computer software in, or otherwise make use of any resource of a computer, computer network, computer program, or computer system. (2)  &#8221;Aggregate [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Texas Computer Crime Laws</p>
<p>TITLE 7. OFFENSES AGAINST PROPERTY</p>
<p>CHAPTER 33. COMPUTER CRIMES</p>
<p><a name="33.01"></a><a name="62184.53493"></a></p>
<p>Sec. 33.01.  DEFINITIONS.  In this chapter:</p>
<p>(1)  &#8221;Access&#8221;  means to approach, instruct, communicate with, store data in, retrieve  or intercept data from, alter data or computer software in, or otherwise  make use of any resource of a computer, computer network, computer  program, or computer system.</p>
<p>(2)  &#8221;Aggregate amount&#8221; means the amount of:</p>
<p>(A)  any  direct or indirect loss incurred by a victim, including the value of  money, property, or service stolen or rendered unrecoverable by the  offense;  or</p>
<p>(B)  any  expenditure required by the victim to verify that a computer, computer  network, computer program, or computer system was not altered, acquired,  damaged, deleted, or disrupted by the offense.</p>
<p>(3)  &#8221;Communications  common carrier&#8221; means a person who owns or operates a telephone system  in this state that includes equipment or facilities for the conveyance,  transmission, or reception of communications and who receives  compensation from persons who use that system.</p>
<p>(4)  &#8221;Computer&#8221;  means an electronic, magnetic, optical, electrochemical, or other  high-speed data processing device that performs logical, arithmetic, or  memory functions by the manipulations of electronic or magnetic impulses  and includes all input, output, processing, storage, or communication  facilities that are connected or related to the device.</p>
<p>(5)  &#8221;Computer  network&#8221; means the interconnection of two or more computers or computer  systems by satellite, microwave, line, or other communication medium  with the capability to transmit information among the computers.</p>
<p>(6)  &#8221;Computer  program&#8221; means an ordered set of data representing coded instructions  or statements that when executed by a computer cause the computer to  process data or perform specific functions.</p>
<p>(7)  &#8221;Computer  services&#8221; means the product of the use of a computer, the information  stored in the computer, or the personnel supporting the computer,  including computer time, data processing, and storage functions.</p>
<p>(8)  &#8221;Computer  system&#8221; means any combination of a computer or computer network with  the documentation, computer software, or physical facilities supporting  the computer or computer network.</p>
<p>(9)  &#8221;Computer  software&#8221; means a set of computer programs, procedures, and associated  documentation related to the operation of a computer, computer system,  or computer network.</p>
<p>(10)  &#8221;Computer  virus&#8221; means an unwanted computer program or other set of instructions  inserted into a computer&#8217;s memory, operating system, or program that is  specifically constructed with the ability to replicate itself or to  affect the other programs or files in the computer by attaching a copy  of the unwanted program or other set of instructions to one or more  computer programs or files.</p>
<p>(11)  &#8221;Data&#8221;  means a representation of information, knowledge, facts, concepts, or  instructions that is being prepared or has been prepared in a formalized  manner and is intended to be stored or processed, is being stored or  processed, or has been stored or processed in a computer.  Data may be  embodied in any form, including but not limited to computer printouts,  magnetic storage media, laser storage media, and punchcards, or may be  stored internally in the memory of the computer.</p>
<p>(12)  &#8221;Effective consent&#8221; includes consent by a person legally authorized to act for the owner.  Consent is not effective if:</p>
<p>(A)  induced by deception, as defined by Section 31.01, or induced by coercion;</p>
<p>(B)  given by a person the actor knows is not legally authorized to act for the owner;</p>
<p>(C)  given  by a person who by reason of youth, mental disease or defect, or  intoxication is known by the actor to be unable to make reasonable  property dispositions;</p>
<p>(D)  given solely to detect the commission of an offense;  or</p>
<p>(E)  used for a purpose other than that for which the consent was given.</p>
<p>(13)  &#8221;Electric utility&#8221; has the meaning assigned by Section 31.002, Utilities Code.</p>
<p>(14)  &#8221;Harm&#8221;  includes partial or total alteration, damage, or erasure of stored  data, interruption of computer services, introduction of a computer  virus, or any other loss, disadvantage, or injury that might reasonably  be suffered as a result of the actor&#8217;s conduct.</p>
<p>(15)  &#8221;Owner&#8221; means a person who:</p>
<p>(A)  has  title to the property, possession of the property, whether lawful or  not, or a greater right to possession of the property than the actor;</p>
<p>(B)  has the right to restrict access to the property;  or</p>
<p>(C)  is the licensee of data or computer software.</p>
<p>(16)  &#8221;Property&#8221; means:</p>
<p>(A)  tangible  or intangible personal property including a computer, computer system,  computer network, computer software, or data;  or</p>
<p>(B)  the use of a computer, computer system, computer network, computer software, or data.</p>
<p>Added  by Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 600, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1985.  Amended  by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 306, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1989;  Acts  1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994;  Acts 1997,  75th Leg., ch. 306, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1997;  Acts 1999, 76th Leg.,  ch. 62, Sec. 18.44, eff. Sept. 1, 1999.</p>
<p><a name="33.02"></a><a name="62185.53494"></a></p>
<p>Sec. 33.02.  BREACH  OF COMPUTER SECURITY.  (a)  A person commits an offense if the person  knowingly accesses a computer, computer network, or computer system  without the effective consent of the owner.</p>
<p>(b)  An  offense under this section is a Class B misdemeanor unless in  committing the offense the actor knowingly obtains a benefit, defrauds  or harms another, or alters, damages, or deletes property, in which  event the offense is:</p>
<p>(1)  a Class A misdemeanor if the aggregate amount involved is less than $1,500;</p>
<p>(2)  a state jail felony if:</p>
<p>(A)  the aggregate amount involved is $1,500 or more but less than $20,000;  or</p>
<p>(B)  the  aggregate amount involved is less than $1,500 and the defendant has  been previously convicted two or more times of an offense under this  chapter;</p>
<p>(3)  a felony of the third degree if the aggregate amount involved is $20,000 or more but less than $100,000;</p>
<p>(4)  a felony of the second degree if the aggregate amount involved is $100,000 or more but less than $200,000;  or</p>
<p>(5)  a felony of the first degree if the aggregate amount involved is $200,000 or more.</p>
<p>(c)  When  benefits are obtained, a victim is defrauded or harmed, or property is  altered, damaged, or deleted in violation of this section, whether or  not in a single incident, the conduct may be considered as one offense  and the value of the benefits obtained and of the losses incurred  because of the fraud, harm, or alteration, damage, or deletion of  property may be aggregated in determining the grade of the offense.</p>
<p>(d)  A  person who his  subject to prosecution under this section and any other  section of this code may be prosecuted under either or both sections.</p>
<p>Added  by Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 600, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1985.  Amended  by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 306, Sec. 2, eff. Sept. 1, 1989;  Acts  1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994;  Acts 1997,  75th Leg., ch. 306, Sec. 2, eff. Sept. 1, 1997;  Acts 2001, 77th Leg.,  ch. 1411, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 2001.</p>
<p><a name="33.021"></a><a name="88259.76539"></a></p>
<p>Sec. 33.021.  ONLINE SOLICITATION OF A MINOR.  (a)  In this section:</p>
<p>(1)  &#8221;Minor&#8221; means:</p>
<p>(A)  an individual who represents himself or herself to be younger than 17 years of age; or</p>
<p>(B)  an individual whom the actor believes to be younger than 17 years of age.</p>
<p>(2)  &#8221;Sexual contact,&#8221; &#8220;sexual intercourse,&#8221; and &#8220;deviate sexual intercourse&#8221; have the meanings assigned by Section 21.01.</p>
<p>(3)  &#8221;Sexually  explicit&#8221; means any communication, language, or material, including a  photographic or video image, that relates to or describes sexual  conduct, as defined by Section 43.25.</p>
<p>(b)  A  person who is 17 years of age or older commits an offense if, with the  intent to arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person, the person,  over the Internet, by electronic mail or text message or other  electronic message service or system, or through a commercial online  service, intentionally:</p>
<p>(1)  communicates in a sexually explicit manner with a minor;  or</p>
<p>(2)  distributes sexually explicit material to a minor.</p>
<p>(c)  A  person commits an offense if the person, over the Internet, by  electronic mail or text message or other electronic message service or  system, or through a commercial online service, knowingly solicits a  minor to meet another person, including the actor, with the intent that  the minor will engage in sexual contact, sexual intercourse, or deviate  sexual intercourse with the actor or another person.</p>
<p>(d)  It is not a defense to prosecution under Subsection (c) that:</p>
<p>(1)  the meeting did not occur;</p>
<p>(2)  the actor did not intend for the meeting to occur; or</p>
<p>(3)  the actor was engaged in a fantasy at the time of commission of the offense.</p>
<p>(e)  It  is a defense to prosecution under this section that at the time conduct  described by Subsection (b) or (c) was committed:</p>
<p>(1)  the actor was married to the minor; or</p>
<p>(2)  the actor was not more than three years older than the minor and the minor consented to the conduct.</p>
<p>(f)  An  offense under Subsection (b) is a felony of the third degree, except  that the offense is a felony of the second degree if the minor is  younger than 14 years of age or is an individual whom the actor believes  to be younger than 14 years of age at the time of the commission of the  offense.  An offense under Subsection (c) is a felony of the second  degree.</p>
<p>(g)  If conduct  that constitutes an offense under this section also constitutes an  offense under any other law, the actor may be prosecuted under this  section, the other law, or both.</p>
<p>Added by Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 1273, Sec. 1, eff. June 18, 2005.</p>
<p>Amended by:</p>
<p>Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 610, Sec. 2, eff. September 1, 2007.</p>
<p>Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1291, Sec. 7, eff. September 1, 2007.</p>
<p><a name="33.03"></a><a name="62186.53495"></a></p>
<p>Sec. 33.03.  DEFENSES.  It  is an affirmative defense to prosecution under Section 33.02 that the  actor was an officer, employee, or agent of a communications common  carrier or electric utility and committed the proscribed act or acts in  the course of employment while engaged in an activity that is a  necessary incident to the rendition of service or to the protection of  the rights or property of the communications common carrier or electric  utility.</p>
<p>Added by Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 600,  Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1985.  Renumbered from Penal Code Sec. 33.04 and  amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.</p>
<p><a name="33.04"></a><a name="62187.53496"></a></p>
<p>Sec. 33.04.  ASSISTANCE  BY ATTORNEY GENERAL.  The attorney general, if requested to do so by a  prosecuting attorney, may assist the prosecuting attorney in the  investigation or prosecution of an offense under this chapter or of any  other offense involving the use of a computer.</p>
<p>Added  by Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 600, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1985.   Renumbered from Penal Code Sec. 33.05 by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900,  Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.</p>
<p><a name="33.05"></a><a name="90701.81328"></a></p>
<p>Sec. 33.05.  TAMPERING WITH DIRECT RECORDING ELECTRONIC VOTING MACHINE.  (a)  In this section:</p>
<p>(1)  &#8221;Direct recording electronic voting machine&#8221; has the meaning assigned by Section 121.003, Election Code.</p>
<p>(2)  &#8221;Measure&#8221; has the meaning assigned by Section 1.005, Election Code.</p>
<p>(b)  A  person commits an offense if the person knowingly accesses a computer,  computer network, computer program, computer software, or computer  system that is a part of a voting system that uses direct recording  electronic voting machines and by means of that access:</p>
<p>(1)  prevents a person from lawfully casting a vote;</p>
<p>(2)  changes a lawfully cast vote;</p>
<p>(3)  prevents a lawfully cast vote from being counted; or</p>
<p>(4)  causes a vote that was not lawfully cast to be counted.</p>
<p>(c)  An  offense under this section does not require that the votes as affected  by the person&#8217;s actions described by Subsection (b) actually be the  votes used in the official determination of the outcome of the election.</p>
<p>(d)  An offense under this section is a felony of the first degree.</p>
<p>(e)  Notwithstanding  Section 15.01(d), an offense under Section 15.01(a) is a felony of the  third degree if the offense the actor intends to commit is an offense  under this section.</p>
<p>(f)  With  the consent of the appropriate local county or district attorney, the  attorney general has concurrent jurisdiction with that consenting local  prosecutor to investigate or prosecute an offense under this section.</p>
<p>Added by Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 470, Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2005.</p>
<p>Amended by:</p>
<p>Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 503, Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2009.</p>
<p><a name="33.07"></a><a name="128541.118438"></a></p>
<p>Sec.  33.07.  ONLINE HARASSMENT.  (a)  A person commits an offense if the  person uses the name or persona of another person to create a web page  on or to post one or more messages on a commercial social networking  site:</p>
<p>(1)  without obtaining the other person&#8217;s consent; and</p>
<p>(2)  with the intent to harm, defraud, intimidate, or threaten any person.</p>
<p>(b)  A  person commits an offense if the person sends an electronic mail,  instant message, text message, or similar communication that references a  name, domain address, phone number, or other item of identifying  information belonging to any person:</p>
<p>(1)  without obtaining the other person&#8217;s consent;</p>
<p>(2)  with  the intent to cause a recipient of the communication to reasonably  believe that the other person authorized or transmitted the  communication; and</p>
<p>(3)  with the intent to harm or defraud any person.</p>
<p>(c)  An  offense under Subsection (a) is a felony of the third degree.  An  offense under Subsection (b) is a Class A misdemeanor, except that the  offense is a felony of the third degree if the actor commits the offense  with the intent to solicit a response by emergency personnel.</p>
<p>(d)  If  conduct that constitutes an offense under this section also constitutes  an offense under any other law, the actor may be prosecuted under this  section, the other law, or both.</p>
<p>(e)  It  is a defense to prosecution under this section that the actor is any of  the following entities or that the actor&#8217;s conduct consisted solely of  action taken as an employee of any of the following entities:</p>
<p>(1)  a commercial social networking site;</p>
<p>(2)  an Internet service provider;</p>
<p>(3)  an interactive computer service, as defined by 47 U.S.C. Section 230;</p>
<p>(4)  a telecommunications provider, as defined by Section 51.002, Utilities Code; or</p>
<p>(5)  a video service provider or cable service provider, as defined by Section 66.002, Utilities Code.</p>
<p>(f)  In this section:</p>
<p>(1)  &#8221;Commercial  social networking site&#8221; means any business, organization, or other  similar entity operating a website that permits persons to become  registered users for the purpose of establishing personal relationships  with other users through direct or real-time communication with other  users or the creation of web pages or profiles available to the public  or to other users.  The term does not include an electronic mail program  or a message board program.</p>
<p>(2)  &#8221;Identifying information&#8221; has the meaning assigned by Section 32.51.</p>
<p>Added by Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 911, Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cyberinternetlawyer.com/texas-computer-crimes.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

