KSR International Co. v. Teleflex, Inc - Obvious non-obviousness?
Tue, May 22, 2007
The District Court dismissed the case, holding that the claim contained in Teleflex's patent was obvious. The Federal Circuit reversed, applying its "Teaching, Suggestion, Motivation" test. Under this test, the combination of existing processes to create new processes is not obvious when there is no prior art that explicitly or implicitly teaches, suggests, or motivates the combination.
Read more →